aubio
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aubio down to the sample
- To: Tom Smith <tsmith32768@yahoo.com>
- Subject: Re: Aubio down to the sample
- From: Paul Brossier <piem@altern.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:49:36 +0000
- Cc: aubio@piem.org
- In-reply-to: <20041129015243.2616.qmail@web53006.mail.yahoo.com>
- References: <20041129015243.2616.qmail@web53006.mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Paul Brossier <piem@altern.org>
- Sender: Piem <piem@altern.org>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 05:52:42PM -0800, Tom Smith wrote: > Paul, > > I'm not sure if you received my previous e-mail, but I'm > interested in knowing whether aubio can determine the exact > location of an onset, down to the sample. I understand there > must be a latency to accommodate both the forward analysis and > the onset detector itself, but is there a method to label the > exact instance the onset occurred? I've been looking at the > peak picker code and it appears that it only gets fed a value > every 512 samples, so it would seem that it has no way of > knowing when it occurred within this window. Can you think of > anything that might resolve the location down to the sample? Hi, Oops, no I did not receive your previous email. Simple things I can think of: Have the peak picking select the local minima before the actual peak, (instead of a fixed 3 frames ahead). Look for the closest zero crossing within the frame given by the peack picker. (will give nicer cuts, but early or late ones may still happen). I will try to have a go with python/aubiocut later this week. Bye, Paul ps: mailing copy to the new mailing list aubio@piem.org. > > Thanks again, Tom Smith tsmith32768@yahoo.com > -- To unsubscribe, send mail to aubio-unsubscribe@piem.org.
- Prev by Date: Re: make error on OS X
- Previous by thread: Re: make error on OS X
- Index(es):